Notes for UFT 160

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:07 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Notes for UFT 160

These will be on the development of the suggestion by Horst Eckardt:

T = h bar omega = (gamma – 1) m c squared = E – E0
p = gamma m v
E = gamma m c squared
E0 = m c squared

View article…

Advertisements

Summary of Major Discovery

The Compton effect is described routinely by a wave interpretation for the photon and a particle interpretation for the electron, but cannot be described self consistently if the de Broglie wave particle dualism is fully implemented. In other words the de Broglie hypotheses have been refuted, the every basis of twentieth century physics have been refuted. This is a major advance but at the same time a major crisis in physics, one which means that special relativity and quantum mechanics are not compatible. If, for example, one tries to explain the Compton effect with a particle interpretation for the photon and a wave interpretation for the electron, the de Broglie Einstein theory becomes self inconsistent and is reduced to nonsense. This has been shown with the basic equations of the theory, but used in an original way that has been hitherto undiscovered. This is an opportunity for a new physics, a true physics, not a pseudophysics like the old standard model.

159(15): Momentum Conservation in Electron Electron Collisions

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 6:14 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 159(15): Momentum Conservation in Electron Electron Collisions

This note gives the momentum conservation law for equal mass collisions of any kind, for example electron electron collison. At 90 degree scatter angle the result is eq. (10). Used with the energy conservation law (11) of equal mass collisions, derived in note 159(14), the electron mass is given by

M = h bar omega’ / c squared

This was also found by computer algebra. Our algebra is right but in physics this is an absurd result becasue the electron mass M is not constant, so the de Broglie Einstein theory fails completely. This is a major discovery immediately obvious to all. Dr Eckardt and I can now proceed to writing up UFT 159 based on these last two notes 14 and 15.

a159thpapernotes15.pdf

View article…

Some Comments on Electron Electron Scattering

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:58 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Some Comments on Electron Electron Scattering

The measured angular frequency for any particle in the Planck / Einstein / de Broglie theory is always E / h bar, where E is the total energy:

E = h bar omega = gamma m c squared

It would be a good idea to apply momentum conservation to interference of electron beams in a Young interferometer or in an electron microscope. Usually, only energy is considered, in the form:

E squared= p squared c squared + m squared c fourth

i.e.

p sup mu p sub mu = m squared c squared

This is of course the Einstein energy equation of special relativity, which quantizes to the Dirac equation. This equation is simply a re-expression of the relativistic momentum gamma m v, so contains information on momentum (Marion and Thornton, “Classical Dynamics”).

View article…

159(14): Energy Conservation in Electron Electron Interaction.

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 1:25 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 159(14): Energy Conservation in Electron Electron Interaction.

This note gives direct tests of the de Broglie hypothesis for any particle:

E = h bar omega = gamma m c squared

and gives a simple expression for the electron mass (eq. (28)). The theory can be tested further with the momentum transfer equations. Data are needed on electron electron Compton scattering, but this type of test is also valid for any equal mass particle particle interaction. From the Rydberg constant, Penning trap and other standards laboratory methods, the electron mass M is known accurately to a relative uncertainty of ten power minus eight. The three frequencies in eq. (28) can be measured experimentally. The momentum conservation equations in the next note will give a further test and eliminate one of the frequencies. The other two are found in an electron electron Compton scattering experiment. The de Broglie momentum hypothesis is for the relativistic momentum of any particle:

p = h bar kappa = gamma m v

a159thpapernotes14.pdf

View article…

Some Comments on the Tests of Einstein / de Broglie

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:22 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Some Comments on the Tests of Einstein / de Broglie

It is emphasized that these are tests using the original equations of the theory, with no additional assumptions at all. The theory has failed badly, catalysing a crisis in modern physics. It has failed badly not only for the photon, but also for the electron. I encourage the working group to code up these equations and search for more data on photon and electron Compton scattering. Both the equations and data are simple, as can be seen I am using undergraduate experiments. As a first suggestion I replaced mass by the ECE expression for mass:

R = (mc / bar) squared

which in the free field limit is also the Dirac and Proca expression for mass. In general there is no reason why R should be a constant, while m must be a constant in the old theory. The latter is now completely refuted and obsolete.

View article…

Some Comments on the Tests of Einstein / de Broglie

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:22 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Some Comments on the Tests of Einstein / de Broglie

It is emphasized that these are tests using the original equations of the theory, with no additional assumptions at all. The theory has failed badly, catalysing a crisis in modern physics. It has failed badly not only for the photon, but also for the electron. I encourage the working group to code up these equations and search for more data on photon and electron Compton scattering. Both the equations and data are simple, as can be seen I ma using undergraduate experiments. As a first suggestion I replaced mass by the ECE expression for mass:

R = (mc / bar) squared

which in the free field limit is also the Dirac and Proca expression for mass. In general there is no reason why R should be a constant, while m must be a constant in the old theory. The latter is now completely refuted and obsolete.

View article…