Impact Summary for the Totality of My Work

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, August 31, 2012 6:59 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Impact Summary for the Totality of My Work

I have drawn up a one sheet summary of the impact of my work over about forty years. It uses the old system of total citations plus Hirsch index and the new open source system of computer generated activity feedback. This is the same system as used for all other physicists. The graph shows that the total number of citations of my work is about six thousand at the very least. For the leading two hundred papers and books it is 4,264. I counted this manually from Google Scholar, so anyone can check it. My total output is about one thousand papers and books to date, plus essays and background notes and so on. My Hirsch index is 27. I carefully calculated it manually. The cut for the world’s top 1% of physicists is 2,073 citations, as shown on the graph. In the open source system in past decade I have generated about 2,600,000 distinct website visits (indicating perhaps five million real study visits) and about twenty million files downloaded, making me the world number one by far in a completely objective, modern analysis. The open source measurements are given frequently on www.aias.us and on this blog. The modern open source scientometrics are vastly superior to the old, primitive system. Even in the old primitive system I am in the top 0.1% of physicists. I used google scholar for the old system. It has nowhere near my total output uploaded as yet. The modern system shows that my best work has been done in the past decade, and that it is all studied all the time around the world. It is the new ECE unified physics, and not the old standard model which makes all the noise and gets all the funding. The best institute in the world at present is AIAS, and many congratulations to all Fellows. In the old citations system severe distortion often occured as citations piled up without ever having been read. Frequently these were citations of incorrect and refuted work such as that of Hawking and Higgs. Obviously, I am not alone in thinking that they are incorrect and refuted. These do not have any modern system available with which to measure their current impact, and have stopped publishing any original work. Higgs is a hundred times less productive than I am for example (about ten significant papers to a thousand). Hawking produces vague books for the general readership, and this is hardly scholarship at all.

aimpactsummary.pdf

View article…

Advertisements

Reducing Science to Triviality

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:54 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Reducing Science to Triviality

I think that science is reduced to triviality when the Baconian principles are forgotten, or when rigorous refutations are ignored. The open source revolution counters the trend towards pointless superegotism in science, refutations cannot be covered up, and after a while it is seen that the cult of the personality denies natural philosophy itself. Competition is a healthy thing in science, but should not be taken too far. Science is not tennis or golf, the best scientists are intellectuals who develop their thinking in their own way, in their own time. They are not mechanisms for the production of funding. The chaff is sifted from the wheat by a process of continuous international study. It may take days, it may take years, but sooner or later the quality of thought determines its own level. A work may be cited endlessly without ever being read, but contemporary computer based feedback systems are able to determine with accuracy whether or not a work is actually being read, in real time, by contemporaries, and over time absorbed and understood. The quality of the work determines whether or not it will be read by future generations. The computer is able to indicate whether or not this will happen. Albert Einstein for example is cited endlessly in the popular press, but not much in scholarly circles, because it is known that much of his work has been refuted. Nevertheless, Albert Einstein contributed greatly to science and the Einstein / de Broglie / ECE School is named after him. Erwin Schroedinger is the best example of a scientist whose work has not been refuted. Compared with these two, hyped up contemporaries have contributed very little. One can begin to see this by a careful study of google scholar, an open source. The only true measure of quality in the end analysis is Baconian, a theory must be correct and tested against reproducible and repeatable experimental data. William of Ockham’s philosophy means that the theory must be as simple as possible. The number of adjustable parameters must be minimized. Contemporary standard physics meets none of these criteria, and is being heavily criticised as empty propaganda which denies centuries of careful work in science. I think that the professions are intensely irritated by the superegotists who deny the truth, they are the opposite of scientists. They do not communicate and do not produce knowledge, because communication rests ultimately on clarity and simplicity.

View article…

“Life of Myron Evans” Read on Everest

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, August 30, 2012 11:56 PM
Author: metric345
Subject: “Life of Myron Evans” Read on Everest

Yesterday there was a visit from Nepal Telecom, from which I conclude that Kerry’s book is being read every day from the top of Everest, oxygen allowing (www.cisp-publishing.com).

View article…

227(8): One Page Summary, Resonant Spacetime Absorption as LENR Catalyst

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Saturday, September 01, 2012 7:44 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 227(8): One Page Summary, Resonant Spacetime Absorption as LENR Catalyst

This is a summary of the ECE theory of LENR, by which resonant absorption of spacetime quanta produce excited nuclear quantum states, these transmute to the products of low energy nuclear fusion, the fused atom and usable energy. Total energy is conserved and the quantized energy of spacetime is transferred to the reactants. Coulombic repulsion between protons of the reactants cannot prevent the nuclear fusion from occurring. In a parallel way, a photon can be absorbed by an electron of an atom, and the electron gains a quantum of energy – the Planck Einstein theory. The “top secret” catalysts used in LENR have been developed over a quarter century. In ECE, all is spacetime and both processes are understood in the same way as part of unified physics, or generally covariant unified field theory. This new types of spacetime quantum can be called the “spaceon” for want of a better appellation. The important thing is that this is a new source of energy for humankind, and that it is expected to be on the market next spring.

a227thpapernotes8.pdf

View article…

227(7): ECE Theory of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR)

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Saturday, September 01, 2012 6:53 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 227(7): ECE Theory of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR)

This note builds on Horst Eckardt’s suggestions yesterday and produces eq. (34) with the Woods Saxon model (1954) for the strong nuclear force. I give some background notes on this model. The ECE postulate for LENR is given in eq. (36). The low energy nuclear reaction occurs due to the resonant absorption of quanta of spacetime energy by the nuclei of the reactants, giving an energy greater than the Coulombic repulsion. Resonance absorption of a quantum of spacetime energy means that the energy of the nuclei of the reactants becomes greater than the Coulombic repulsion between the protons (and electrons) of the reactants. The release of energy in LENR is due to the fact that the binding energy of the product of the LENR is less than the sum of the binding energies of the reactants, so conservation of energy means that excess, and of course usable, exothermic energy is observed experimentally. It is claimed that the data are reproducible and repeatable after a quarter century of experimentation, and I don’t challenge this. The first LENR device is expected to be on the markets next spring, and should get rid of wind turbines. The exact details of how the quanta of spacetime energy are absorbed must be due to the experimental design, which is patented. Details are unknown. However it is known that a catalyst is involved. Horst may like to solve eq. (34) numerically, and the results can be presented at the Zurich LENR conference if the organizers allow. I can also invite Douglas Lindstrom to be co author of this paper, UFT227.

a227thpapernotes7.pdf

View article…

American Biographical Institute semi-scam

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Saturday, September 01, 2012 12:48 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: American Biographical Institute semi-scam

I would call this a semi-scam. I have been bombarded by them for many years. The only real reference vehicle is “Marquis Who’s Who”. Wikipedia is controlled by the standard propagandists and is under heavy criticism for bias and personal animosity. The ABI is based in North Carolina and offers things for sale. There are many “Man of the Year” awards, a plurality of the singular. Any real prize gives you money, not the other way around. Marquis costs nothing for an entry, (if you are good enough that is), and they give you the option of purchasing things like wall plaques. You have to be in the top 0.001% of your profession to get into “Marquis Who’s Who in the World” (one in a hundred thousand). Any cat can get into Wikipedia provided it tows its whiskers. These plaques are well made in mahogany. The British “Who’s Who” is a snobby set up reserved for Fellows of the Royal Society only. If one looks at the impact of FRS’s they are fequently well below the average. Human nature as usual. ABI seems to offer some things without having to pay for them, and that is the only OK thing as far as I am concerned provided you are satisfied with the professional quality of the company with which you would appear. Douglas Lindstrom is in “Marquis Who’s Who in the World” and his biography can be seen online at the Marquis Site for a prescription fee. He is one of fifteen AIAS Fellows in MWWW at present, several more nominated this year.

In a message dated 31/08/2012 18:52:07 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Myron:
Recently I received a solicitation from the American Biographical Institute saying that I was nominated for their Man of the Year award for 2012. Did you receive something similar? I suspect that this is a scam, but I am not sure.
Doug

View article…

Clifford Family

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:22 PM
Author: metric345
Subject: Clifford Family

Many thanks, the de Clifford Family can be traced back to early Norman times on Celtic Royal Genealogy and the Troubridge Family may be there too. Henry VIII was descended from Henry III Plantagenet (Planta Genesta) through his mother Margaret Beaufort. As you know, his father was Henry VII Tudor descended from Tewdwr Mawr, my direct ancestor. Henry VII was the only Lancastrian left after the Wars of the Roses and his claim to the throne went back to Henry III. I will draft up a more detailed genealogy. The Seymour Family were also Norman, St. Mour. My oldest Norman line is de Turbeville, supposed to have been in the Battle Abbey Roll, but recent research shows that only fifteen companions of Guillaume de Normandie (William of Normandy) can be proven from only three contemporary documents. The Battle Abbey Roll is nowhere near contemporary. I listed these in an earlier posting. Among these is the Beaumont Family.

In a message dated 30/08/2012 19:11:11 GMT Daylight Time writes:

Hello Myron, This is quite interesting and could be pursued a little further, I believe the Clifford part of my family is from a Welsh line with my paternal great-grandmother under the surname Thomas. I have seen Clifford Castle near Ross, it was quite an impressive stronghold in its day, although the village is now merely small and pretty. My mother traced her ancestry to Rear Admiral, sir Thomas Troubridge (1st Baronet of Plymouth) – whose title was awarded whilst he was one of Nelson’s captains in 1799.
I shall have to see if more can be made from these scraps of information from my sister.
Simon

On Thursday, August 30, 2012, wrote:

This was Henry III Plantagenet to Edmund Plantagenet, to his daughter Mary who married Henry V de Percy, to Henry VI de Percy, Earl of Northumberland, to Henry Hotspur de Percy, born 1364, ally of Owain Glyndw^r, to his daughter Elizabeth who married John de Clifford (b. 1389), to his daughter Mary who married Philip Wentworth, to Henry Wentworth (b.1448), to his daughter Margery Wentworth, mother of Jane Seymour, third wide of Henry VIII, her distant cousin, also descended on his mother’s side (Margaret Beaufort) from Henry III Plantagenet. Henry VIII and Jane Seymour were also distant cousins via the early Norman Efa Marshal as described earlier on this blog. The de Clifford Family were those of a powerful Marcher Baron, and later became the Clifford Family. It may be that Simon Clifford is a descendant.

View article…