The Republic of 1642 to 1660

Pleasure! As you see, Cromwell was not exactly a friend of the Levellers. I think that royalists these days live in a fantasy. It suits the aristocrats, but not the majority.

In a message dated 18/07/2013 16:50:15 GMT Daylight Time, vivienne.swaby@blackberry.orange.co.uk writes:

Hello Myron. Thank you for this. Your thoughts and comments are very much appreciated. Vivienne.

Advertisements

Photon Mass and Energy from Spacetime

These concepts are interrelated in the notes for UFT245. It is well known that the vacuum produces the vacuum corrections, for example the Lamb shift and Casimir effect, and the anomalous g of the electron. These phenomena can be understood now in terms of photon mass and vacuum charge current density, and related to photon mass. UFT85 – UFT87, UFT156, and UFT168 – UFT170 are some of the UFT papers that deal with this topic, but UFT245 is a significant advance. ECE is a unified field theory, so brings together all aspects of physics in an infinite number of new ways.

245(4): Interpretation of the Photon Mass with Vacuum Charge / Current

This note develops the new linear ECE theory to interpret the photon rest mass in terms of eq. (23), in terms of the ratio of vacuum charge density to vacuum potential. So the Yukawa solution is rejected in favour of the solution (13) and the form of the Coulomb law (inverse square) is not affected by photon mass. Neither is the form of the Ampere law. So experiments based on the Yukawa solution are rejected as meaningless. They have incorrectly assumed that photon mass changes the form of the Coulomb law from inverse square. The simple use of the Compton experiment as in UFT244 results in a photon mass about the same as the electron, but at the same time UFT244 revealed that particle scattering theory violates conservation of energy. That is a major crisis in physics. The next step is to relate this new linear ECE theory to the original nonlinear ECE theory of 2003.

a245thpapernotes4.pdf

Paper 231 section 4

Pleasure !

In a message dated 18/07/2013 09:41:17 GMT Daylight Time, ver@cisp-publishing.com writes:

Thank you

Victor

From: EMyrone@aol.com [mailto:EMyrone@aol.com]
Sent: 18 July 2013 09:17
To: thenarmis@gmail.com; alex.hill@yahoo.com; garethjohnevans@hotmail.co.uk; rpmc_6@hotmail.com; burleigh.personal@gmail.com; avanderm@du.edu; horsteck@aol.com; steve.bannister@econ.utah.edu; ver@cisp-publishing.com; dwlindstrom@gmail.com; cr1460solarinc@gmail.com; sean@somewhere.ws
Subject: Paper 231 section 4

This looks fine, and I am forwarding to Victor for publication. The graphics are very useful as usual.

Sent: 18/07/2013 08:38:51 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: paper 231 section 4

Here is the pdf version.

Betreff: Re: paper 231 section 4

Horst, the equations came through for you didn’t they? Perhaps you could make a pdf version and send it Myron, please.

Doug

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:49 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

Unfortunately no, is there a file with equations?

In a message dated 17/07/2013 13:38:15 GMT Daylight Time, dwlindstrom writes:

Myron, did you not get the equations in either of the files I sent you?

Doug

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:55 PM, <EMyrone> wrote:

OK many thanks, once the equations are filled in we can send it to Victor for processing. I agree with Horst that Section 4 of UFT230 can be included if there is an explanation of its speculative nature. Both sections look excellent and thanks to co authors. There has been a tremendous amount of interest already in these LENR papers, both from the site and blog.

Sent: 16/07/2013 20:01:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: paper 231 section 4

Here is what is available for Section 4 of UFT 231. I don’t think it would be worth the massive effort required to generate the several 3D plots required to cover all of the variables. I am still working on the application of these papers to the Ni + p reaction of Rossi for example, so should have a much better demonstration then.

I might suggest that section 4 UFT 230 not be included. I am not happy with the calculations I’ve done so far ( too speculative)for this paper.

Doug

Development of the New Type of ECE Theory

This was initiated in the last note and is a linear ECE theory which derives a lot of information from the tetrad postulate, including the Proca equation, the inhomogeneous and homogeneous field equations, the Poisson equation and much else. The nest step is to relate this new linear theory to the original ECE theory of 2003, a non linear theory that includes the B(3) field. I will also see if the linear theory gives spin connection resonance.

Paper 231 section 4

This looks fine, and I am forwarding to Victor for publication. The graphics are very useful as usual.

Sent: 18/07/2013 08:38:51 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: paper 231 section 4

Here is the pdf version.

Betreff: Re: paper 231 section 4

Horst, the equations came through for you didn’t they? Perhaps you could make a pdf version and send it Myron, please.
Doug

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:49 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

Unfortunately no, is there a file with equations?

In a message dated 17/07/2013 13:38:15 GMT Daylight Time, dwlindstrom writes:

Myron, did you not get the equations in either of the files I sent you?
Doug

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:55 PM, <EMyrone> wrote:

OK many thanks, once the equations are filled in we can send it to Victor for processing. I agree with Horst that Section 4 of UFT230 can be included if there is an explanation of its speculative nature. Both sections look excellent and thanks to co authors. There has been a tremendous amount of interest already in these LENR papers, both from the site and blog.

Sent: 16/07/2013 20:01:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: paper 231 section 4

Here is what is available for Section 4 of UFT 231. I don’t think it would be worth the massive effort required to generate the several 3D plots required to cover all of the variables. I am still working on the application of these papers to the Ni + p reaction of Rossi for example, so should have a much better demonstration then.

I might suggest that section 4 UFT 230 not be included. I am not happy with the calculations I’ve done so far ( too speculative)for this paper.

Doug

PAPER_231_SECTION_4.pdf

MIlton’s Paradise Lost

This is the famous question of Adam to Michael (Book XI, 779 – 786). Adam’s experience teaches him to mistrust the evidence of his own eyes, and asks why humankind was destroyed by the events that led to the flood. This question is very relevant in our times, with the bomb hanging over us all. This is the Miltonian sonnet form (decasyllabic, mainly iambic, no rhyme):

I had hope
When violence was ceas’t, and War on Earth,
All would have gone well,peace would have crown’d
With Length of happy days the race of man;
But I was far deceiv’d; for now I see
Peace to corrupt no less than War to waste.
How comes it thus? Unfold, Celestial Guide,
And whether here the Race of man will end.

This is a metaphor for Milton’s thoughts about the restoration, he himself narrowly escaped execution by revengeful royalists: “……… for now I see / Peace to corrupt no less than War to waste”. By this he meant the corruption of the ideas of the Republic. Milton was a Puritan, but not the pulpit thumping variety as far as I can see. He was articulate end eloquent, regarded as the second poet in the English language to Shakespeare. The latter was also an early republican and agnostic, without prejudice or dogma, influenced in turn by Michelle de Montaigne (Kenneth Clark, “Civilization”). Apparently the blind Milton used to recite poetry to his secretaries in old age. So I assume that he was allowed a staff as a former Foreign Minister and great poet that he was. Royalists can be swayed by poetry. Dylan Thomas knew reams of Milton by heart from boyhood, and recited it in The Mermaid and Brown’s Hotel, and other haunts in London. Thomas was clearly influenced by Milton. For example the tremendous power of the last few lines of “Ceremony after a Fire Raid” (available on youtube with Thomas narrating):

The masses of the sea
The masses of the sea under
The masses of the infant bearing sea
Erupt, fountain, and enter to utter for ever
Glory, glory, glory,
The sundering ultimate kingdom of genesis’ thunder.

There are multiple meanings as usual in Thomas, for example “mass” denotes the Mass, as well as the weight an power of the sea. The sea bears an infant and new life. Dylan Ail Don was a Celtic half god of the sea of Y Mabinogion, Math fab Mathonwy. There is rebirth and hope after Dylan had seen an infant killed in an air raid in London. Here writes a compassionate man, deeply shocked and repelled by violence. Milton was repelled by the restoration and the apparent loss of all he had fought for. In fact Milton is remembred while all his persecutors have been long forgotten.

Advertisements