419(4): The Three Kepler Laws in m Theory

419(4): The Three Kepler Laws in m Theory

The three famous Kepler laws are given in this Note for m theory. Kepler’s first law is that an orbit is an ellipse. This is changed completely using Eqs. (1) and (2), giving forward and retrograde precession, shrinking and expanding orbits and so on. Of particular interest is Kepler’s third law, Eq. (22), because the last note made the major discovery that the Newton theory in S2 is wildly wrong. In the m theory the central mass about which the S2 orbits is not a black hole, it is given by Eq. (35). By using Eq. (33) it is possible to find the time T for one orbit self consistently. Currently co author Horst Eckardt is working towards the same goal using a different method.



Computation of S2 orbit

The Gravitational Red Shift in m Theory

The Gravitational Red Shift in m Theory

This is lambda sub infinity / lambda sub c = 1 / m(r) power half. It is claimed in the literature about S2 that m(r) = 1 – r0 / r, but if this function gives no bound states, another m(r) must be used that gives all the data self consistently.

m Theory of Light Deflection due to Gravitation

m Theory of Light Deflection due to Gravitation

The m theory gives the light deflection in terms of m(r) in Eq. (47). In the limit m(r) goes to one the famous formula (49) is recovered. As argued in the classic papers UFT150 to UFT155, Einstein got the right result but in a hugely elaborate and mysterious way, using m(r) = 1 – r0 /r. In contrast m theory is far simpler, gives an elegant result and completely refutes EGR in yet another way. Any slight deviations from the well observed Eq. (49) can be explained in terms of an m(r). This plays a role similar to something like the Debye correlation time in dielectrics, it is characteristic of any given experiment in astronomy. The Debye correlation time characterizes any dipolar molecule in dielectrics.


419(1) : Application of m Theory to the S2 Star

419(1) : Application of m Theory to the S2 Star

Many thanks a very interesting result because the orbit of the S2 star can be explained exactly with this value of m(r). Are the values of v and r at closest approach sufficient for a numerical integration to produce the precessing orbit of m theory? That will give the astronomers a much needed idea of the expected magnitude of the S2 precession, and will show whether EGR is anywhere near the truth or just totally wrong.

419(1) : Application of m Theory to the S2 Star

I evaluated the formulas. I used the latest value of the gravitational constant published in 2016 (see Wikipedia):
G = 6.67408(31) [SI units]

The precession values remain the same within 3-4 digits.
The ratio of v/c at r[min] is 2.55%, therefore relativistic effects are small.
The formula of m theory gives

m(r[min]) = 0.9895

For comparison, the value from the Newtonian velocity (eq.(1) of the note) gives

m(r[min]) = 0.999999

as expected. This is consistent with the fact that the ratio v/v_N is 98.9%. We do not know the experimental error.
If further velocity measurements are available, we would obtain more or less m=1, because the radius is larger there.


Am 11.11.2018 um 13:18 schrieb Myron Evans:

Subject: 419(1) : Application of m Theory to the S2 Star

This note shows that the orbit of the S2 star is essentially Newtonian, any deviations from Newton such as those in Eqs. (2) and (3) can be explained in a well defined limit of m theory by Eq. (4), from which m(r) may be determined from the data given in this note. On May 18th 2018 the S2 star was at closest approach to the large mass that it orbits. This has a mass M of 8.572 ten power 36 kilograms. Clearly this is not a "black hole" because the theory of black holes erroneously omits torsion. By now this is very well known. Einsteinian general relativity predicts a forward S2 precession of +4,896 arcseconds per earth century. This compares with the famous +43 arcseconds per earth century for Mercury in the solar system. EGR always produces a forward precession. The experimental result however is given by Eqs. (2) and (3), which indicate that the orbit of S2 is Newtonian within the uncertainty in the astronomical data.This means that the experimental precession is zero plus or minus an uncertainty. From another point of view the difference between Eqs. (2) and (3) can be taken to indicate the need for m theory as in Eq. (4), from which m(r) can be found from the astronomical data. The R power n theory of gravitation produces a retrograde precession of minus 22,459 arcseconds per earth century and the Yuhawa theory of gravitation produces a forward precession of plus 44,917 arcseconds per earth century. There can be no confidence in the dogmatic claim that the S2 star "verifies" EGR.

Simplest ECE2 Theory of Precessions

Simplest ECE2 Theory of Precessions

Simplest ECE2 Theory of Precessions

This is delta phi = plus or minus omega T in frame rotation theory. Here omega is the angular velocity of the frame rotation and T is the time taken for an orbit. Forward and retrograde precessions can be described in this way and omega can be related to the m(r) function of m theory. Any observable precession can be described easily in this way. EGR fails completely to describe retrograde precession. The EGR dogmatists and its propaganda outlet, Wikipedia, are clearly obsolete, there are at least three other theories of gravitation, ECE2 and its m theory; R power n gravitation and Yukawa gravitation, probably many more. ECE and ECE2 is by far the most developed. In the first few days of November 2018, 3352 documents have already been downloaded from www.aias.us. It is particularly interesting to study the attached webalizer file for those with username and password. It contains a list of all 3,352 items found by going to "Top 100 of 3352 Total URL’s" and clicking on the small item "view all URL’s" at the foot of this table. The entire www.aias.us has been downloaded four or five times in the first few days of November. This interest defies all adjectives, it is equivalent to the energy in E = m c squared. In other words there is a tremendous impact because there are over three thousand items and tens of millions of readers. This impact has been built up during my time as Civil List Pensioner, 2005 to present. I am appointed directly by the British Head of State, Elizabeth II, and I am not an academic. At AIAS / UPITEC we have devised a new and detailed measure of impact. All indicators have shown a vast amount of interest over eighteen years. The blog www.drmyronevans.wordpress.com was established first, in 2000 by Bob Gray of Biophan Inc., followed by www.aias.us in 2002, and www.upitec.org. They are all archived on the Wayback Machine, www.archive.org.