## Rigorous Self Consistency of UFT389

This is a significant achievement and congratulations!

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 04/10/2017 10:41:36 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Discussion of Note 390(2)Tests showed that introducing a factor of 1/sqrt(3) in Q gives consistent results. Eqs. (31) and (32) must give the same result when resolved for omega_0. This then has an additional factor of sqrt(3). I will modify section 3 of paper 389 with this info.

Furthermore,div (omega*phi) = 0

is fulfilled in the non-relativistic case so that the Newtonian theory extended to ECE2 now seems to be consisitent.

Horst

Am 04.10.2017 um 08:28 schrieb EMyrone:

Thanks again, your idea is fine. The problem is to solve the trace antisymmetry equation (29) and the scalar antisymmetry equation (32) simultaneously for omega sub 0. Any method of solution is valid, including yours, and regauging may not be needed. Regauging must leave the gravitational field g and the gravitomagnetic field omega unchanged as you know. Every problem in physics has to be obey these new laws of conservation of antisymmetry, so this is why interest in UFT389 for example has built up rapidly (This morning’s stats). It is easy to see that the Einstein theory violates conservation of antisymmetry because the Einstein theory can be put in the form of the Einstein Maxwell equations, which violate conservation of antisymmetry. We are again on a new record high interest for October in the UFT papers and books.

To: EMyrone

Sent: 03/10/2017 21:32:59 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: Source of InconsistencyConsidering eq. (35) of note 390(2), it could be sufficient to rescale Q by a constant factor to obtain consistency with omega_0 derived from (31). However such a “simple regauging” changes the gravitomagnetic field so this procedure is not appropriate. I am not sure if such a multiplicative modification can be achieved at all by a regauging according to eq. (62).

Horst

Am 03.10.2017 um 14:19 schrieb EMyrone:

I think that the inconsistency arises from Eq. (38). This should be replaced by Eq. (31) of Note 390(2). The scalar spin conenction must obey both Eqs. (32) and (35) of Note 390(2), and the Note shows how this can be achieved with simple regauging. Note 390(2) starts with the Newtonian gravitational potential, used as a very good approximation because precession effects are small. It works out the spin connection vector and then the vectror potential of gravitation. It then works out the gravitomagnetic field, and then calculates the scalar spin connection from the Lindstrom constraint, Eq. (29). The scalar spin connection must also obey Eq. (35). this is achieved with the regauging procedures in Eqs. (61) to (63) of Note 390(2). The arbitrary gauge function psi is adjusted so that the scalar spin connection satisfies both the law of conservation of trace antisymmetry and the law of conservation of scalar antisymmetry. The vector potential is worked out from the spin connection by applying the law of conservation of vector antisymmetry. Finally, Eq. (70) of Note 390(2) must also be obeyed. This is a new equation not previously known or used. The antisymmetry is a fundamental property of Cartan geometry. Einstein violates these laws because he does not consider torsion. So the Nobel Prize announced today is meaningless. The entire ECE School of Thought rejects it.

Sent: 03/10/2017 09:24:54 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Section 3 of paper 389I finished section 3 as an extension of paper 384,3. There seems to be

an inconsistency of the Lindstrom constraint in the non-relativistic

case, either a dimensional factor of 3 is missing, or omega_0 has to be

defined differently. It seems not to be possible to simply useomega_0 = -3 c/r

to resolve the problem. This deserves further study. Doug: where is the

mathematics of the constraint described?Horst

No trackbacks yet.