Discussion of Final Version of Note 381(1)

Thanks again. I would simply say that this is a solution, and perhaps a unique solution. The most general solution is found by solving seven equations in seven unknowns. So I think I will now write Sections 1 and 2 of UFT321

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 14/07/2017 14:44:15 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Final Version of Note 381(1): Plane Wave Solution of ECE2

These definitions of A and omega are also my “best guess”. The antisymmetry laws are then fulfilled as follows:

However in the definition of B the terms nabla x A and omega x A cancel in the X and Y component:

One can introduce a factor different from 1 in the Z component of omega, for example

but then the B field gets different factors:

and the antisymmetry laws are no more fulfilled. Maybe I am pedantic but a solution that is overall correct would be better.

Horst

Advertisements
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: