Discussion of Note 380(1)

Thanks again, the origin of this typo is that the minus sign was accidentally left out in Eq. (1). Then Eqs. (2) and (3) are the Cartesian component form of:

g = – del phi + omega phi

In consequence of the minus sign being left out in Eq. (1), the omega sub X and omega sub Y terms in eqs. (2), (3), (5) and (6) should have positive signs in front of them. The correct expressions are given in Eqs. (7) and (8).

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 22/06/2017 16:54:34 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 380(1): Evaluation of the Q three vector and Spin connection four vector

It seems that the sign in front of omega_X and omega_Y must be positive in eqs. (2,3).


Am 19.06.2017 um 13:44 schrieb EMyrone:

This analysis introduces consideration of the gravitomagnetic field and considers the Newtonian and zero and counter gravitational limits. Any experimental claims of counter gravitation can be analyzed straightforwardly with ECE2 theory.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: