## Refutation of Gravitational Waves in UFT375

Excellent work, well done! This is a clear refutation of the claims of EGR to have produced gravitational waves, and confirms Stephen Crothers’ criticisms of the LIGO experiment and his independent refutations of EGR. These computations with the “bare lagrangian” also show that a fluid spacetime is needed in cosmology. However it is a major achievement to show that the ECE2 lagrangian is alone enough to produce precession. Precession has also been computed with the ECE2 theory named “fluid gravitation”, and that can give all kinds of precessions, including retrograde precession. This ill be developed in UFT376. The daily feedback shows that fluid gravitation is already attracting great interest. So there are more refutations of EGR than needles on a hedgehog. If a dog(matist) puts his nose into a hedgehog he will run a mile. I remember this happening to the sheepdog back on the farm (Autobiography volume one).

To: EMyrone@aol.com

Sent: 25/04/2017 17:21:12 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Re: First Attempt at ComputationI introduced a suitable units system. The program is working now. Relativistic effects for the Hulse-Taylor double star system are even smaller than for the S2 star. The approximation of second order for the gamma factor gives the same results as the exact formulas. In view of these results it is very questionable why such a weak realtivistic system should radiate noticeable gravitational waves.

I will write up the rest of section 3 tomorrow.Horst

Am 25.04.2017 um 14:29 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks for making this attempt. The Maclaurin expansion looks very interesting, and non relativistic results will also be very interesting for m1 about equal to m2. The orbit should be much more interesting than an ellipse. I would suggest the use of c = 1 and G = 1 units and expressing masses in terms of mass of the sun (mass sun = 1). This would make the numbers much easier to deal with so there is no floating point overflow. Then, higher terms in the Maclaurin expansion can be used as long as u < 1. The trick seems to be to keep r dot dot r dot / c squared manageable. Any such system will do, the idea is to try to compute the precessions. Since EGR has been refuted in eighty three ways in the UFT papers alone, there is nothing much left of it, but ECE2 seems to be infinitely flexible and applicable. It is not fixated with claims of super accuracy. Stephen Crothers has refuted EGR in an ways, n getting close to infinity. It may be possible to devise reduced unit code that will keep r dot dot r dot / c squared within range of the computer’s capability. If this turns out to be difficult then we can develop the theory for a “clean” system such as the S2 stars where m1 << m2 and the theory is much simpler.

To: EMyrone

Sent: 25/04/2017 12:19:19 GMT Daylight Time

Subj: Calculations for Hulse-Taylor pulsarThe relativistic 2-body Lagrangian leads to extremely complicated

equations of motion that are not handable, even with relative

coordinates. I tried a series expansion of the inverse gamma factor:sqrt(1 – u) = 1 – u/2 – u^2/8 + …

The linear term exactly gives the non-relativistic equation. Inclusion

of the quadratic term leads to numbers of magnitude 10 power 140 or so

which exceeds numerical operability. We would need an adopted system of

units like atomic units in quantum mechanics. It seems that I have to

limit the calculation to the non-relativistic case.Horst

No trackbacks yet.