Final Version of the Last Note

OK thanks, Note 368(6) is the correct version to be checked by computer algebra. The problem in general is exceedingly intricate because of the structure of Eq. (5)in which theta = theta(t). This equation (5) should be checked by computer algebra. The others are given by Marion and Thornton. The new Euler Lagrange equation is equation (2), which gives Eq. (5). Eqs. (6) and (7) are given by Marion and Thornton.

In a message dated 23/01/2017 09:27:04 GMT Standard Time, mail@horst-eckardt.de writes:

I quickly checked the analytical solution of eq.(29), it is a growing exponential function, whatever that means. I will await the final note for further analysis.

Horst

Am 23.01.2017 um 10:03 schrieb EMyrone:

I will be sending out a final version of the last note, and as usual my hand calculations will be checked using Maxima by co author Horst Eckardt. The hand calculations are used to get an idea of the problem, and this is the method in every UFT paper to which computer algebra can be applied. So there will be virtually no chance of any human error and it will be all a matter of interpretation. The notes should be regarded as sketches for the final painting.

Advertisements
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: