Third video sent by Dave Burleigh

Many thanks to Dave Burleigh! There are many basic effects that the standard model of classical dynamics cannot describe. We will see what can be done with ECE2 fluid dynamics.

Sent: 11/01/2017 16:45:25 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 347(5a): Force Analysis of the Gyroscope

This one is interesting as well with a hint about shape.

On 1/11/2017 8:06 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Many thanks for this replication! Yes – that’s the basic idea, in these experiments the spinning wheel is held at a fixed point, by Laithwaite and the replicator. Doug mentions a gyroscope that seems to have disappeared from sight. In classical dynamics the force of gravitation and the force of the moving frame exactly balance each other, so a conventional spinning top for example does not rise above the ground. In fluid dynamics the balance is changed by the convective derivative, which in general contains nine terms. The simplest configuration is that the wheel is held on an arm that is parallel to the earth’s surface, and the wheel is spun about this arm.

347(5a): Force Analysis of the Gyroscope

This is a replication of Laithwaites experiment:

Do I understand correctly, that the velocity field is that of spacetime or ether and has to be pre-defined in a suitable way so that the Laithwaite lifting comes out?


Am 11.01.2017 um 13:07 schrieb EMyrone:

It is clear from this force analysis that the classical dynamics of the gyroscope never gives a counter gravitational force because of the result (12), the invariant of the galilean transformation. This is everyday observation, because the point of a spinning top for example never lifts off the ground. However in fluid dynamics, there is such a force, given by Eq. (18). It is a vacuum force and is very small (by observation) in a spinning top, but in the Laithwaite or Shipov experiments it could be responsible for their observations. This can be looked in to using computer algebra by precisely defining the configurations using by Laithwaite and Shipov. The force field of Eq. (18) can be plotted with gnuplot. It is is positive valued in the k axis, giving counter gravitation. It is due to the fluid nature of spacetime, aether or vacuum. The video made by Laithwaite needs to be studied very carefully to find exactly what kind of motion he describes. It is clear that no one can hold a forty pound (20 kilo) weight at arms length for very long. Laithwaite does so with ease.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: