Archive for April, 2016

## Numerical Checking and Development of Note 345(6)

Many thanks, I would say that this is the first time that the geodetic effect of Gravity Probe B has been evaluated correctly, using the methods of post Einsteinian physics based on correct geometry. The remaining discrepancy between theory and experiment can be attributed to a gravitomagnetic Lande factor. The obsolete theory claimed magical precision that cannot be true. A precise result can never be obtained from a geometry that is completely wrong. Evidently these conclusions are accepted at the world’s best universities, otherwise they would not have been studying ECE and ECE2 every day for twelve years. So now I will proceed to write up my sections of UFT345 and leave the numerical results for your Section as usual. The post Einsteinian physics also gives a precise explanation for energy from spacetime in UFT311, and also produces the light deflection by gravitation precisely. It also gives a plausible explanation for LENR in UFT326 ff. We have developed several ways of explaining perihelion precession, Lense Thirring and geodetic precessions. All of these results are studied at the best universities in the world every day. The older Einsteinian theory of general relativity was a peak of intellectual achievement, but is now obsolete as always happens in a healthy subject that does not stagnate.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/04/2016 15:12:47 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 345(6): ECE2 Theory of the Geodetic Effect

Your calculation is basically correct. The experimental value of the gravitomagnetic field is precisely

For the theoretical values of the gravitomagnetic field, I used r=7.02e6 as for the Lense-Thirring effect. The result is about half the experimental value, the ratio varying between 0.35 and 0.71. The precise values depend on the angles theta and phi. Since the j axis is chosen for the angular momentom of the probe, it makes sense to plot Omega(theta) for phi=90 degrees (see plot in attachment). Then the highest theta variance is seen. For phi=0 the value is constant but this probably makes no sense since the angular momentum then would be in the bold i direction ratherin the bold j direction (where it was chosen by definition).

Horst

Am 28.04.2016 um 14:12 schrieb EMyrone:

This is a theory of the geodetic precession of 6.6144 arc seconds a year measured by Gravity Probe B, which cost \$700 million dollars. The geodetic effect is explained using the same starting equation as the Lense Thirring effect (Note 345(5)), taking into account that Gravity Probe B was in a polar orbit at an inclination of almost exactly 90 degrees, orbiting once every 90 minutes. Gravity Probe B did not “verify” the incorrect Einstein field equation. In fact this paper will be the first correct explanation of Gravity Probe B, at no cost to the taxpayer. The effect is described by a parameter x defined in Eq. (22). Values of theta and phi can be found by computer algebra from the experimental result. From the point of view of a frame of reference on Gravity Probe B, the earth rotates, and appears to be a rotating frame generating the angular momentum (11) in the j axis, because the orbit of Gravity Probe B is a polar orbit about an axis perpendicular to the rotation axis of the earth. The earth is considered to be a static shere in a spinning frame of reference for the purposes of the geodetic effect. In the Lense Thirring effect the earth is a spinning sphere in a static frame of reference. All metrics of the Einstein field equation are well known to be incorrect, the obsolete theory used these incorrect metrics, so could not have explained anything. The vast twenty first century avant garde school of physics around AIAS and UPITEC accepts that the Einstein field equation is completely wrong. We have replaced it with several theories, which are the truly accurate theoreis, and which can also describe the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy. The same theory has been used in the 345 UFT items. It is the first successful unified field theory.

345(6).pdf

# Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

## Checking 345(5)

Many thanks again! I think that this is good enough agreement although it can be refined. The magical precision of the Einstein theory is a myth, as we all know by now, like the Beatles “Magical Mystery Tour”.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/04/2016 14:49:28 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 345(5): Final Version of the Calculation of the Lense Thirring Precession

The numbers are correct. I used slightly different constants from Wikipedia, but the results are the same in the first three digits.

Horst

Am 27.04.2016 um 15:26 schrieb EMyrone:

This version uses the methods of UFT117 and incorporates the factor 2 needed to define the gravitomagnetic dipole moment as in Eq. (19). The result is 49.4 milliarcseconds a year. The experimental result is 40.9 plus or minus 7.8 milliarcesconds a year. The gravitomagnetic field is defined in exact analogy with the magnetic flux density in the dipole approximation, Eq. (15). The observed angular velocity of the earth is used, omega = 7.2921150 ten power minus five radians per second (2 p i / T, where T is 24 hours). The earth’s gravitomagnetic field as defined by Pfister is Eq. (1). In deriving this result he assumed that the gravitomagnetic dipole moment of the earth is its angular momentum L. However, the gravitomagnetic gyromagnetic ratio of 1/2 is needed as in Eq. (19). This is defined by replacing the electrodynamical gyromagnetic ratio – e / (2m) by m / (2m) = 1/2. In the obsolete Einstein theory the Einstein field equation is linearized to give a set of equations which look like the ECE2 field equations. However the Einstein theory’s geometry is torsionless, and completely wrong. The ECE2 field equations are rigorously correct. The next and final note will recalculate the geodetic precession with the definitions of this note. The mysterious claims to magical accuracy of the Einstein theory collapse entirely in a whirlpool galaxy. The Einstein theory gives a velocity curve that goes to zero as r goes to infinity. The experimental result goes to a plateau, explained in several different ways by ECE and ECE2.

345(5).pdf

Thanks again!

## Daily Report 27/4/16

The equivalent of 276,687 printed pages was downloaded during the day (941.885 megabytes) from 3025 downloaded memory files (hits) and 520 distinct visits each averaging 4.3 memory pages and 21 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio for the day of 85.40, main spiders cnsat(China), Google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 1538, Top ten items 1400, Evans / Morris papers 891, Collected scientometrics 521(est), F3(Sp) 421, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 313, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 284, Autobiography volumes one and two 244, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 235, UFT88 180, Principles of ECE 153, Evans Equations 122, Self charging inverter 102, Engineering Model 93, CEFE 88, UFT311 77, UFT321 65, Llais 43, Three World records by MWE 22, List of Prolific authors 20, Lindstrom Idaho lecture 19, UFT313 52, UFT314 45, UFT315 50, UFT316 50, UFT317 46, UFT318 57, UFT319 54, UFT320 56, UFT322 54, UFT323 38, UFT324 73, UFT325 66, UFT326 48, UFT327 42, UFT328 51, UFT329 53, UFT330 48, UFT331 61, UFT332 41, UFT333 44, UFT334 40, UFT335 27, UFT336 63, UFT337 44, UFT338 51, UFT339 62, UFT340 48, UFT341 55, UFT342 61, UFT343 44, UFT344 17 to date in April 2016. University of the Andes Colombia F13(Sp), University of Cuenca Ecuador UFT170(Sp); California Institute of Technology(Caltech) UFT18; Texas Southern University UFT177; Tohoku University Japan UFT70; British Awareness in Schools Project general. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage files attached for April 2016.

# Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

## 345(6): ECE2 Theory of the Geodetic Effect

This is a theory of the geodetic precession of 6.6144 arc seconds a year measured by Gravity Probe B, which cost \$700 million dollars. The geodetic effect is explained using the same starting equation as the Lense Thirring effect (Note 345(5)), taking into account that Gravity Probe B was in a polar orbit at an inclination of almost exactly 90 degrees, orbiting once every 90 minutes. Gravity Probe B did not “verify” the incorrect Einstein field equation. In fact this paper will be the first correct explanation of Gravity Probe B, at no cost to the taxpayer. The effect is described by a parameter x defined in Eq. (22). Values of theta and phi can be found by computer algebra from the experimental result. From the point of view of a frame of reference on Gravity Probe B, the earth rotates, and appears to be a rotating frame generating the angular momentum (11) in the j axis, because the orbit of Gravity Probe B is a polar orbit about an axis perpendicular to the rotation axis of the earth. The earth is considered to be a static shere in a spinning frame of reference for the purposes of the geodetic effect. In the Lense Thirring effect the earth is a spinning sphere in a static frame of reference. All metrics of the Einstein field equation are well known to be incorrect, the obsolete theory used these incorrect metrics, so could not have explained anything. The vast twenty first century avant garde school of physics around AIAS and UPITEC accepts that the Einstein field equation is completely wrong. We have replaced it with several theories, which are the truly accurate theoreis, and which can also describe the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy. The same theory has been used in the 345 UFT items. It is the first successful unified field theory.

a345thpapernotes6.pdf