Archive for February, 2016

Discussion of Control over Gravitation

Fully agreed.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/02/2016 10:28:02 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Control over Gravitation

Fully agreed, a lot can be speculated. It should be possible to overcome gravity and levitate etc using an amplified gravitational field but, as you say, first of all a Gaser has to be built and the theory tested. It all makes good sense within a unified field theory as you are now showing.

Sent from my Samsung device

Control over Gravitation

The possibilities are limited only by imagination, provided as ever that the theory is always tested at each stage against reproducible experimental data – Baconian science suggested by my distant ancestral cousin Francis Bacon. In ECE2 the graviton and photon are both bosons, (spin one particles), they are both quanta of energy, respectively gravitational and electromagnetic. So there is a Planck distribution of gravitons and the Einstein theory of absorption and stimulated emission can be applied, producing the theory of the gaser. The latter produces a beam of gravitation in exact analogy with the laser beam. So there is a beam of gravitation. The initial idea is to use a test mass, and if the latter is attracted to the beam, it proves the existence of gravitational radiation. After working out the theory of the gaser, I wish to try to explain light deflection by gravitation through the interaction of gravitons and photons, because that theory can be tested by experimental data. These new ideas also introduce the absorption of gravitons by atoms and molecules, and their re emission. The early ECE2 papes UFT314 to about UFT318, contain ideas on counter gravitation. In ECE2 this is possible. ECE2 is general relativity using the correct geometry. The idea of basing physics on geometry goes back to the Greeks and Celts.

Sent: 29/02/2016 04:47:30 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 341(3): Corrected Rayleigh Jeans Density of States of Gravitational Radiation

I was wondering about Mass with all these GEM like effects.
Can mass be considered a ratio of the absorption of gravitons to the underlying particle such as electron or photon?
Does amplification alter the mass or even cause emission if some kind of saturation and overflow point is reached through amplification? Can it be tuned to be columnar like the famous star trek Tractor Beams or broadened into a sheet such as their Force Fields or perhaps shaped into an imbalanced torus for directed propulsion?

The mind wanders at the possibilities with control over local gravity. Also does this affect how a craft would approach the limit c if it fired a GASER ahead of itself along its trajectory creating a tunnel through spacetime of sorts pulling itself forward and pushing with a repulsive GASER behind as a means for the famed WARP drive of science fiction?

Sean

On Feb 28, 2016, at 6:32 AM, EMyrone wrote:

A gross error in the Rayleigh Jeans density of states of radiation was corrected in UFT291 for electromagnetic radiation, and the calculation is given here for gravitational radiation. Rayleigh assumed Eq. (3), which seems to be reasonable on the surface, but becomes untenable when the integrations are carried out correctly. This was first done in UFT291. A new theorem of integral calculus appears as a by product, and is given in Eq. (25) directly from the basic definition of an integral, first given by Riemann in the nineteenth century. The Riemann definition of an integral in calculus is the well defined limit of an infinite sum of infinitesimal areas. This error in the Rayleigh Jeans density of states affects the Planck distribution and the Stefan Boltzmann law, and the whole of quantized black body radiation theory and quantum mechanics, so a complete rethink is needed, as pointed out in UFT291, already studied many thousands of times. I am ready to proceed to the theory of absorption and emission of quanta of gravitational radiation, defining the Einstein A and B coefficients for absorption and emission of gravitons by atoms and molecules. Then the theory of the GASER will be developed (gravitational amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) in an effort to design and build a gaser, which would amplify gravitational radiation by many orders of magnitude in the laboratory. This is an effort to amplify gravitational radiation to the point where it can be detected by a test mass in the laboratory. Similarly the laser (now well known to the general public) amplifies light by many orders of magnitude, and the maser amplifies far infra red / microwave radiation by many orders of magnitude. The EDCL Room 262 group worked with a far infra tunable red laser made in California.

<a341stpapernotes3.pdf>

=

Daily Report Saturday 27/2/16

The equivalent of 169,662 printed pages was downloaded during the day (618.589 megabytes) from 2244 downloaded memory files (“hits”) and 570 distinct visits, each averaging 3.6 memory pages and 15 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 75.61 for the day, main spiders cnsat(China), Google, MSN and yahoo. Top ten items 1496, Collected ECE2 1443, Collected scientometrics 531, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 359, F3(Sp) 346, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 291, Principles of ECE 275, Collected Evans / Morris 270(est), Autobiography volumes one and two 228, UFT88 218, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 183, Evans Equations 103, Engineering Model 93, CEFE 91, Self charging inverter 74, UFT311 61, Llais 61, UFT321 60, Lindstrom Idaho talk 30, Most prolific authors 22, Three world records by MWE 20, UFT313 58, UFT314 42, UFT315 46, UFT316 61, UFT317 56, UFT318 63, UFT319 57, UFT320 45, UFT322 48, UFT323 37, UFT324 63, UFT325 69, UFT326 50, UFT327 30, UFT328 77, UFT329 51, UFT330 54, UFT331 51, UFT332 53, UFT333 44, UFT334 63, UFT335 63, UFT336 71, UFT337 48, UFT338 69, UFT339 54, UFT340 20 to date in February 2016. Machine Learning Department Carnegie Mellon University UFT161; University of Washington spidering of site; National University of Singapore Stephen Crothers’ criticisms of vacuum big bang; University of Edinburgh UFT140. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: February 2016 – URL
Generated 12-Feb-2016 05:04 EST

341(3): Corrected Rayleigh Jeans Density of States of Gravitational Radiation

A gross error in the Rayleigh Jeans density of states of radiation was corrected in UFT291 for electromagnetic radiation, and the calculation is given here for gravitational radiation. Rayleigh assumed Eq. (3), which seems to be reasonable on the surface, but becomes untenable when the integrations are carried out correctly. This was first done in UFT291. A new theorem of integral calculus appears as a by product, and is given in Eq. (25) directly from the basic definition of an integral, first given by Riemann in the nineteenth century. The Riemann definition of an integral in calculus is the well defined limit of an infinite sum of infinitesimal areas. This error in the Rayleigh Jeans density of states affects the Planck distribution and the Stefan Boltzmann law, and the whole of quantized black body radiation theory and quantum mechanics, so a complete rethink is needed, as pointed out in UFT291, already studied many thousands of times. I am ready to proceed to the theory of absorption and emission of quanta of gravitational radiation, defining the Einstein A and B coefficients for absorption and emission of gravitons by atoms and molecules. Then the theory of the GASER will be developed (gravitational amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) in an effort to design and build a gaser, which would amplify gravitational radiation by many orders of magnitude in the laboratory. This is an effort to amplify gravitational radiation to the point where it can be detected by a test mass in the laboratory. Similarly the laser (now well known to the general public) amplifies light by many orders of magnitude, and the maser amplifies far infra red / microwave radiation by many orders of magnitude. The EDCL Room 262 group worked with a far infra tunable red laser made in California.

a341stpapernotes3.pdf

Daily Report 26/2/16

The equivalent of 142,533 printed pages was downloaded during the day (519.674 megabytes) from 2472 memory files downloaded (hits) and 503 distinct visits each averaging 3.5 memory pages and 14 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 57.66 for the day, main spiders cnsat(China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 1392, Top ten items 1389, Collected scientometrics 474, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 352, F3(Sp) 340, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 277, The Principles of ECE 268, Evans / Morris papers 260 (est), Autobiography Volumes One and Two 222, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 180, UFT88 159, Evans Equations 100, Engineering Model 91, CEFE 91, Self charging inverter 72, UFT321 60, Llais 59, UFT311 58, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 30, Most prolific authors 22, Three world records by MWE 19, UFT313 55, UFT314 39, UFT315 43, UFT316 58, UFT317 55, UFT318 58, UFT319 57, UFT320 43, UFT322 37, UFT323 37, UFT324 61, UFT325 67, UFT326 50, UFT327 30, UFT328 77, UFT329 50, UFT330 50, UFT331 49, UFT332 53, UFT333 40, UFT334 62, UFT335 59, UFT336 68, UFT337 46, UFT338 68, UFT339 53, UFT340 18 to date in February 2016. Perimeter Institute general; Physics University of Bayreuth general, UFT177, publications section, IBM and collected computer code, refutation of Copenhagen with classical Young interferometer (double slit) theory (Eckardt and Bruchholtz), LCR resonant, non linearity and the ECE field equations; Students at the University of Lueneberg my armorial bearings and armorial badge; University of Washington Autobiography Sonnets (my autobiography in Miltonian sonnets); Spanish Ministry of Defence Educational note two; Autonomous Metropolitan University of Mexico City Iztapalapa F2(Sp), F4(Sp). Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for February 2016.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: February 2016 – URL
Generated 12-Feb-2016 05:04 EST

Reflection of Gravitational Waves by Superconducting Sheets

I did a quick lit search on google. It seems that superconducting sheets can reflect gravitational waves. The idea is that a gaser would be made in the same way as a laser, with a fully reflecting and half reflecting mirror. It assumes that the graviton can be absorbed and emitted following the A and B coefficient theory. I cannot see any fundamental objection to this because the quantum of gravitational wave energy in ECE2 is h bar omega = gamma m c squared where m is the graviton mass. In the next note I will finish the Rayleigh Jeans calculation, with the corrections introduce din UFT291, then proceed to the Einstein absorption and stimulated emission theory of a graviton interacting with an atom or molecule.

Subj: Re: Discussion of Systematic Approach to Gravitational Radiation Theory

Have you an idea how GASERs can be made? What is the mechanism to reflect gravitational waves? Which size has a GASER to be?

Horst

Am 27.02.2016 um 09:13 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks to AIAS Co President Gareth Evans. Advances in technology are so rapid now that these ideas may be realized within a generation. They will drive the dogmatists crazy, just at the time when they think they have verified Einstein (wrong again). I think that most physicists are now ECE physicists to some degree. In ECE2 the graviton is a boson, so is governed by the Planck distribution. There is a gravitational Stefan Boltzmann law so the energy density of gravitational radiation is proportional to the fourth power of temperature for black body gravitational radiation. The idea of the gaser is to amplify gravitational radiation so that it can be detected. In theory, very powerful gasers can be made, so gravitational waves are detected by attracting a sample mass with a gaser. In this way Jeremy Jones could be sucked into the apparatus, and never seen again.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 26/02/2016 18:26:07 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Systematic Approach to Gravitational Radiation Theory

These are astonishing advances, totally unexpected but making complete sense in the context of a unified theory. The idea of a Gaser that can project a beam of gravitional radiation is mind boggling with all sorts of possible ramifications and potential uses including for levitation and transportation. Science fiction turning into science and technological fact – “Beam me up Scotty” !!

Sent from my Samsung device

Top Five Items for February 2016 To Date

These are listed below, x indicates printed pages to hits ratio.

1) F3(Sp) (322 hits, 202.93 megabytes, 55,658 printed pages, x = 172.85).
2) UFT25 (176 hits, 139.477 megabytes, 38,256 printed pages, x = 217.36).
3) UFT43 (127 hits, 38.441 megabytes, 10,543 printed pages, x = 83.01).
4) UFT169 (115 hits, 40.291 megabytes, 11,051 printed pages, x = 96.10).
5) UFT88 (107 hits, 48,270 megabytes, 13,239 printed pages, x = 123.73).

These are always very popular, and have been for years. There are two more files for UFT88 so the total number of hits is 151 (18,683 printed pages off www.aias.us). These figures are increased by 60% for combined sites (www.aias.us and www.upitec.org). So there is a huge amount of studying by ECE scientists and engineers. The 25th UFT paper is 16 pages long, A4 single spaced, so one printed page = 3.646 kilobytes of memory. So the paper has been read 2,391 times off www.aias.us in February to date and 3,826 times off combined sites in just over three weeks. This phenomenal amount of interest is echoed by all the three thousand or so items on www.aias.us, which is why Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe describes this profound change in thought as the post Einsteinian paradigm shift. Note that the printed pages to hits ratio (denoted x) is very high, and varies a lot for each item. The bytes downloaded and printed page measures are much more meaningful than hits. In my opinion it does not matter how the item is read, i.e. whether it is read manually by an user or by computer or by spidering. Spidering software is very sophisticated and is meant to index items for search engines. The result is that very many ECE items are on the first page of google. Although the standard model still gets the media attention, prizes, jobs, grants and so on, it is being rejected almost entirely in favour of ECE by hundreds of thousands around the world. It has become clear that prizes and jobs and grants are a closed shop, reserved for politically correct thought. We all know this, and the more profound thinkers are going over to ECE in droves. There is only one kind of thought in physics – experimentally testable logic. Anything else is meaningless dogma, especially if it cannot be experimentally tested. So on a profound level, standard physics is in a terrible condition.