Archive for October, 2013

Original Article by Steven B. Krivit on Low Energy Nuclear Reactors

Many thanks indeed, this article is published by a mainstream journal and is full of interest. With your permission I am distributing to the AIAS colleagues and posting on my www.aias.us blog.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 30/10/2013 18:56:03 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Original Article by Steven B. Krivit

enclosed, sir

At 09:10 AM 10/30/2013, you wrote:

By all means. I find “New Energy Times” to be full of interest. Our work on LENR started with UFT226 on www.aias.us. I think that LENR is here to stay and is a new industrial revolution.

In a message dated 30/10/2013 15:21:47 GMT Standard Time, :
Dear Dr. Evans,

I read this outstanding commentary:
http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/lenr-replication-by-toyota/

Apparently you read some blog on Oct. 28 of someone who copied my news report of Oct 22:
https://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/10/22/journal-publishes-toyotas-independent-replication-of-mitsubishi-lenr-transmutation/

May I send you a copy of my latest Elsevier publication on LENRs?

Steven

Steven B. Krivit
Publisher and Senior Editor, New Energy Times
369-B Third Street | Suite 556 | San Rafael, California | USA 94901
T 310.470.8189 | M 310.721.5919 | F 213.226.4274
www.newenergytimes.com

2013KrivitElsevier-ReviewofLow-EnergyNuclearReactions.pdf

Some content on this page was disabled on November 2, 2015 as a result of a DMCA takedown notice from Elsevier. You can learn more about the DMCA here:

https://en.support.wordpress.com/copyright-and-the-dmca/

Advertisements

Daily Report 30/10/13

There were 3075 hits from 499 distinct visits, 12.4% spiders from baidu, google, MSN and softlayer. Auto1 201, Auto2 69, Feedback Book 69, Evans Equations 46 (English) over a thousand (Spanish) Englynion 22, Autosonnets 20; Second Book of Poetry 14, Autoarchive 11 to date in October. European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) UFT166(Sp); California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo Educational Note 2; Ohio University 2D paper by Douglas Lindstrom; Public Net Portland State University UFT166; University of Central Florida UFT176; Mathematics University of Houston UFT42; Andalucian Junta Essay74(Sp); University of Barcelona UFT152; Laboratory of Algorithmic Informatics Universite de Paris Diderot Geometric Theory of Fields; Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Ioannina Greece Potential Waves; School of Advanced Computing Mexican National Polytechnic Institute UFT149(Sp); Hewlett Packard Europe UFT166(Sp); Faculty of Science Free University of Amsterdam UFT42; Wellington Girls’ College New Zealand UFT43; Bihor University Romania UFFT43; Intelbi Company Russia general; Girton College Cambridge UFT85; University of Wales Swansea UFT171. Intense interest all sectors, attached usage file updated for October 2013.

Original Article by Steven B. Krivit

By all means. I find “New Energy Times” to be full of interest. Our work on LENR started with UFT226 on www.aias.us. I think that LENR is here to stay and is a new industrial revolution.

In a message dated 30/10/2013 15:21:47 GMT Standard Time, :

Dear Dr. Evans,

I read this outstanding commentary:
http://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/lenr-replication-by-toyota/

Apparently you read some blog on Oct. 28 of someone who copied my news report of Oct 22:
https://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/10/22/journal-publishes-toyotas-independent-replication-of-mitsubishi-lenr-transmutation/

May I send you a copy of my latest Elsevier publication on LENRs?

Steven

Steven B. Krivit
Publisher and Senior Editor, New Energy Times
369-B Third Street | Suite 556 | San Rafael, California | USA 94901
T 310.470.8189 | M 310.721.5919 | F 213.226.4274
www.newenergytimes.com

Energy from the Vacuum

Using google keywords “Energy from the Vacuum” brings up nearly six million entries. In ECE theory this is understood in terms of geometry, in papers such as UFT167 to UFT170 on the relevant Poynting Theorems and in many other ways. These papers have been intensely studied for years by staff and students of all the best universities. A Poynting Theorem can also be deduced from the Cartan and Evans identities via the engineering model, which produces the field equations both of electromagnetism and gravitation. Eckardt and Lindstrom, in several papers, have discussed how these equations reduce to Maxwell Heaviside, The first Casimir chip has been produced at MIT (2012), and R. l. Forward demonstrated electric energy from the Casimir effect in Phys. Rev. B, 30(4), 1700 (1984) from the Hughes Research Laboratories. Wikipedia still tries to depict all this in childishly insulting terms. As soon as the insults begin to flow we know that the strident condemnation comes from someone who is a dogmatist, and in all probability never goes into a laboratory. The websites www.et3m.net and www.upitec.org contain several working devices that take energy from the vacuum, or as I prefer to describe it: energy from spacetime. Spin connection resonance theory has shown how such effects may be amplified to very useful levels. Those who condemn, insult and threaten do great harm to physics and should be subjected to professional censure and the common law.

LENR Replication by Toyota

If one googles “LENR”, there are 582,000 results. The latest news on Oct. 28th. 2013 is that Toyota researchers have replicated a deuterium gas permeation experiment , published in the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. So low energy nuclear fusion (LENR) is mainstream science. I wish to counter the factual distortion by wikipedia, which is still trying to claim that LENR is practiced by a small fringe. It used to be known as cold fusion, and I waited for about a quarter century for solid experimental replications to start to appear, then developed papers such as UFT226 ff. with Horst Eckardt and Douglas Lindstrom. These have made a huge impact judging again by our own accurate scientometrics. To deny such replications is unscientific, so wikipedia is itself becoming a fringe outlet for dogma. Its physics section is controlled by dogmatists who are rapidly being left behind by progress. It is well known that wikipedia tries to destroy reputations and careers of non dogmatists, or to insult them by mindless labels. So with an “encyclopedia” like that, who needs the Thought Police of 1984? Wiki is instantly outflanked by google, anyone can find out the truth by using google.

252(2): Magnetizability of Hydrogenic Orbitals

This note uses the new methods developed in UFT250 and UFT251 to develop the theory of the magnetizability of hydrogenic orbitals. The magnetizability is in general a tensor but can be represented by the scalar average of eq. (15). This can be worked out for each hydrogenic orbital by computer algebra. A great deal of new information is emerging from a systematic evaluation of the hamiltonian of the fermion equation, term by term, in this case using the new type of Pauli algebra (2) and (3).

a252ndpapernotes2.pdf

FOR POSTING: Physics Nobel Prize Committee Unable to Reply to Criticisms

The physics Nobel Prize Committee has been unable to reply to these criticisms, which were also sent to CERN. The latter was also unable to reply. More accurately they probably did not read the criticisms and refused to reply. So the funding for this type of behaviour must be stopped. They know that the claim of the Higgs boson is groundless, and based on mathematical error and dogmatism. Accordingly I call on the entire ECE community of scientists and engineers to reject this year’s physics Nobel prize. The chemistry prize on the other hand seems quite reasonable, but to single out one or two scientists for a Nobel prize has become an entirely meaningless process. The majority dissenting opinion is that the Higgs boson is pseudoscience. The Higgs boson does not exist in nature. The Nobel prize committee also refused to look at the book of scientometrics sent to it with these criticisms, a book which proves beyond reasonable doubt that there there is a complete rejection of standard physics.

To Physics Nobel Prize Committee:

I agree with Axel Westrenius and with many responsible scientists who have refuted the existence of the Higgs boson, many times, in many ways, for many years. You have a policy of not corresponding with anyone about Nobel Prizes so I make this in to an open letter that will reach thousands of concerned colleagues worldwide. Axel Westrenius sent you UFT225 on www.aias.us which refutes the GWS sector of the standard model. The calculations were checked with computer algebra. The mathematics behind GWS were shown to be complete nonsense, so there have been machinations that have produced a new kind of sausage meat. In addition it is well known that Higgs did not infer the Higgs mechanism alone. His h index is only eleven and his contributions have been minor. Some other points:

1) My inference of the B(3) field in 1992 means that the photon has mass. The B(3) field developed into the ECE theory which has attracted tens of millions of readings off www.aias.us in the last decade and will continue to do so indefinitely. This means a complete rejection of standard physics. Attached for your information is an overview book of interest in ECE. It is studied by all the best universities in the world. There are now 251 UFT papers, all in Google Scholar, all of which refute the Higgs boson by implication of photon mass.

2) The Higgs mechanism is a deus ex machina intended to give mass to massless particles. This is like patching up a tyre with hot air. The particle is not massless to begin with. A massless photon results in all kinds of well known difficulties, notably the E(2) little group, a two dimensional spacetime, and also results in muldiple flaws in Einsteinian general relativity as in UFT150B on www.aias.us and many hugely popular essay broadcasts of my work by Robert Cheshire.

3) So in summary only the Nobel Prize committee believes in the Higgs boson, which is the result of laundering data and using so many adjustables that you could produce any result you wanted. The Nobel Prize has been orchestrated therefore at the cost of tens of billions, and is of no use to humankind at all. It will probably help tip Europe into a great depression.

4) You have breached the terms of the Will of Alfred Nobel. A Nobel Prize must be given for the betterment of humankind, not for a wildly expensive fantasy. There are thousands of physicists worthier of the award, which has therefore been devalued to insignificance. There may evolve an international movement to stop the profligate waste of public money at CERN and I call on the British Government to withdraw from CERN. The UFT225 paper was sent to CERN but it was ignored most cynically. This is a sure sign that CERN is ungoverend and that it funds itself. It must therefore be subject to a rigorously impartial international inquiry.

Myron Evans

Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List Pensioner, D. Sc., Ph. D., B. Sc. (Wales)
AIAS President
www.aias.us
U. S. Dual Citizen.

In a message dated 27/10/2013 02:33:47 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Nobel Committee for Physics members,

By way of introduction; I am a life long layman student of physics, now 83. I emigrated with my family to Australia from Malmö in Sweden in early 1986, and have kept following developments in theoretical physics ever since.

The purpose of this message is to draw your attention to the work of several ex academia physicists which appear to cast very serious doubts about the validity of the reasons for awarding this years prize in Physics for the Higgs boson. Several papers of particular relevance are attached for you.

I have the general impression that the number of layman students of physics like me in the general public is rapidly growing and that there is increasing alarm amongst us about where academic physics is heading. Alfred Nobel himself is obviously unable to protest, but we, the Hoi Polloi, may soon refuse to foot the bill.

Best regards,
Axel Westrenius

overview1.docx