Archive for August, 2011

## Analysis by Marion and Thornton

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, August 26, 2011 10:30 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Analysis by Marion and Thornton

 The attempted solution of the claimed equation d squared u / d theta squared + u – delta u squared = 1 /alpha of EGR is given by Marion and Thornton on pp. 268 ff of their third edition of “Classical Dynamics” (Harcourt 1988). I used this as a course book as a full professor of physics, with good student reaction to the course. It consists of several approximations using arbitrary trial functions and they just ignore one term which they call a “small periodic disturbance of the normal Keplerian motion”. So they ignore an inconvenient result of EGR that is not actually observed in any orbit. Einstein himself did something similar on Nov. 22nd 1915, and was immediately criticised by Schwarzschild on Dec. 22nd, 1915. This makes me very uneasy about Einstein’s own character. There was certainly pressure on him to produce a result of EGR that could be measured, because very few accepted EGR at the time. The starting point of MArion and Thornton (their Eq. (7,73 of the third edition) is exactly the same lagrangian equation that is used in UFT 193 (in prep), so they cannot be correct because the true and stable precessing ellipse gives a force law that is the sum of an inverse square and inverse cube term. Einstein tried to force a precessing ellipse out of a force law that is the sum of an inverse square and inverse fourth term. That is just not possible, yet it has been forced on science for nearly a century.

View article…

## Another test of EGR

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, August 26, 2011 7:19 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Another test of EGR

 This would be to integrate the claimed equation of EGR (Marion and Thornton eq. (7.76)) numerically to find the orbit. The claimed equation is d power 2 u / d theta squared + u = 1 / alpha + delta u squared where u = 1 / r and where alpha and delta are constants. It is now known that this cannot give a precessing ellipse, it gives some other kind of orbit.

View article…

## 193(8): The Parabola and Conic Section in Cartesian Coordinates

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, August 26, 2011 1:10 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 193(8): The Parabola and Conic Section in Cartesian Coordinates

 This is the derivation of the parabola and conic section in Cartesian coordinates. The meaning of alpha for a parabola can be seen from Eq. (5), when X is zero, Y = alpha. If light is trapped in a Newtonian ellipse, a closed orbit, around an object of mass M, the photon mass m can be calculated from eq. (12) knowing the angular momentum. a193rdpapernotes8.pdf

View article…

## 192(3), Final Version: m(r) Function for a Precessing Ellipse

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Monday, August 15, 2011 1:14 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 192(3), Final Version: m(r) Function for a Precessing Ellipse

 This is the final version of the note, which should be checked by computer algebra. The final expression for m(r) is Eq. (6). In the previous note I dropped the sin(x theta) of Eq. (2). The final m(r) is not the “Schwarzschild” m(r) = 1 – r0 / r a192ndpapernotes3.pdf

View article…

## Artwork by Robert Cheshire from the Precessing Ellipse

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:57 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Artwork by Robert Cheshire from the Precessing Ellipse

 This is fine artwork by Robert Cheshire from the precessing ellipse: r = alpha / (1 + cos (x theta))

View article…

## Artwork from the Precessing Ellipse and Logarithmic Spiral

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:53 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Artwork from the Precessing Ellipse and Logarithmic Spiral

 A lot of art can be made from the precessing ellipse. One could also try the log spiral: r = r0 exp (zeta theta) where zeta is the pitch. For a very large pitch the outer arms are drawn out into a nearly straight line as observed in the Hubble space telescope. In a recent paper (UFT 190), the velocity curve of a spiral galaxy was explained with zeta goes to infinity as r goes to infinity. Einsteinian GR has no explanation at all, in fact fails completely to describe a whirlpool galaxy. The log spiral appears in shells and other natural phenomena. The so called “precision tests of the Schwarzschild metric” are complete nonsense. This can be shown very easily as in the following postings on this bog.

View article…

## 192(5): Comparison of Solar System and Whirlpool Galaxy m(r) Functions

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:57 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 192(5): Comparison of Solar System and Whirlpool Galaxy m(r) Functions

 These are given in this table, and are similar functions, suggesting that the dynamics of the solar system and whirlpool galaxy have an underlying cause, i.e. a new cosmology based on ECE theory. The next note will develop this theme in terms of m(r) = 2 – exp(2exp(- r / R)) obtained from the correct torsional geometry with a single antisymmetric connection. Various analytical curves can be used to produce their own m(r) functions in spherical spacetime. In UFT 108 the binary pulsar was considered, a precessing ellipse spiralling inwards. This also has its own m(r) function and is a precessing ellipse with alpha getting smaller, where 2 alpha is the latus rectum, a characteristic of the ellipse. Ray Delaforce and Horst Eckardt could graph this function. It is, for a fixed eccentricity epsilon: r = alpha(r) / (1 + epsilon cos(x theta)) where alpha decreases with r. For example alpha = alpha sub 0 exp ( – r / R0) where R0 is a characteristic radial length. This ought to be a precessing ellipse spiralling inwards and that can be checked graphically. Its m(r) function can then be found. a192ndpapernotes5.pdf

View article…