Preliminary version of UFT 410, section 3

Many thanks to Co President Gareth Evans for his comments. It is a little known fact that Barry John wrote a lot of physics in his classic "Instructions for the Fly Half". The torpedo pass from Gareth Edwards was developed from spacetime torsion.
Preliminary version of UFT 410, section 3
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

Thanks for checking. From the logarithmic scale of planteary radii in Fig. 2 it can be seen that there is a "hole" between the fourth and fifth planet. This may indicate that there originally was a planet that broke into pieces and is the origin of the asteroid belt. Some astronomers suppose this.

Horst

Am 19.07.2018 um 06:51 schrieb Myron Evans:

These are very interesting first results from the new universal law of precession, excellently written up by Horst Eckardt. I can find only one minor typo, the caption for Table 3 is the wrong one, accidentally taken from UFT406, but the table itself us correct, very important for astronomy, and full of interest. The caption should be something like "Table of omega, omega sub + and omega sub – ". The angular velocity of the universal law of precession changes sign between the inner and outer planets, separated by an asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter as pointed out by Horst, so the direction of spacetime torsion also changes sign between Mars and Jupiter. I was not aware of this asteroid belt when I wrote sections 1 and 2, but now that Horst has pointed it out in Section 3, it seems to be the obvious cause of the switch in sign in the angular velocity of the new universal law of precession. It is a new and original discovery in astronomy which was missed completely in the obsolete Einsteinian era because the most important feature of the solar system, spacetime torsion, was unknown to Einstein in 1915 and until ECE started in 2003, was never considered correctly.

Preliminary version of UFT 410, section 3

I preliminarily finished the section of the solar system. Hulse Taylor pulsar and S2 star will follow. Please check for consistency of the calculations and conclusions.

Horst

Advertisements

Preliminary version of UFT 410, section 3

These are very interesting first results from the new universal law of precession, excellently written up by Horst Eckardt. I can find only one minor typo, the caption for Table 3 is the wrong one, accidentally taken from UFT406, but the table itself us correct, very important for astronomy, and full of interest. The caption should be something like "Table of omega, omega sub + and omega sub – ". The angular velocity of the universal law of precession changes sign between the inner and outer planets, separated by an asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter as pointed out by Horst, so the direction of spacetime torsion also changes sign between Mars and Jupiter. I was not aware of this asteroid belt when I wrote sections 1 and 2, but now that Horst has pointed it out in Section 3, it seems to be the obvious cause of the switch in sign in the angular velocity of the new universal law of precession. It is a new and original discovery in astronomy which was missed completely in the obsolete Einsteinian era because the most important feature of the solar system, spacetime torsion, was unknown to Einstein in 1915 and until ECE started in 2003, was never considered correctly.

Preliminary version of UFT 410, section 3

I preliminarily finished the section of the solar system. Hulse Taylor pulsar and S2 star will follow. Please check for consistency of the calculations and conclusions.

Horst

paper410-3.pdf

Notes 411(1)

a411thpapernotes1.pdf

410(8): Details of calculation

Interpretation of law of precession?

Interpretation of law of precession

Interpretation of law of precession

This is the procedure I used, to find omega’ in your notation, omega sub + or omega sub – in the notation of the notes. This might well be different from any omega that is listed by NASA, whose data are sometimes internally inconsistent as shown in this morning’s discussion. The eccentricity of the S2 star system is about 0.88 as used in UFT375. I looked up the eccentricity of the HT binary pulsar, it is 0.6171334 according to wiki, whose data are different from Stanford / NASA as discussed in UFT375. It is simply a matter of using best judgement to make up for the numerous errors of other people and crunching out the equations of the new law of precession using a Maxima program.

Basing on note 410(7), we have the equation (4)

Delta phi = 2 pi/c^2 * v^2 (*)

with

v^2 = vN^2 + 3 * v_theta^2
or
v^2 = vN^2 – v_theta^2.

It is defined

v_theta = omega * r

with an average orbital radius r. So both sides of eq. (*) are defined experimentally. To be consistent, these sides have to be compared and should be equal.
If there are major discrepancies, I recommend to define

v_theta = omega’ * r

where omega’ is an angular velocity of frame rotation which is different from the regular orbital angular velocity. This would describe the true spacetime torsion in a star system.

Horst

Graphs of 410(8): Results from the Universal Law of Precessions applied to the Planets

Graphs of 410(8): Results from the Universal Law of Precessions applied to the Planets

Graphs of 410(8): Results from the Universal Law of Precessions applied to the Planets

Many thanks, the graphs are interesting and well prepared as usual. I can type up the Tables now that the results have been checked and will begin to write up UFT410.

This is a picture with double-log scale, perhaps even better.

Horst

Am 09.07.2018 um 13:58 schrieb Horst Eckardt:

Her are the graphs: a linear plot omega(r) and a logarithmic plot. In the linear plot, omega- has been taken negative but the values are so small that all points come to lie on the zero line. In the log plot omega- has been handled positive as required for log plots. It is seen that the magnitude of omega decreases continuously with the planet distance from the sun, but there is a change in sign. There seems to be a change in torsion direction between Mars and Jupiter.

Horst

Am 09.07.2018 um 07:55 schrieb Myron Evans:

410(8): Results from the Universal Law of Precessions applied to the Planets

In this final note for UFT410 results are given from the universal law of precessions of ECE theory. Precessions are described in terms of the angular velocity of frame of rotation of the ECE2 infinitesimal line element. The precessions are matched exactly in every case by a given angular velocity that originates in spacetime torsion. Results are also given for the Hulse Taylor binary pulsar and for the S2 star. Tables of results such as this can be drawn up for every precession in the universe, and the Einstein field equation discarded as obsolete in many ways.

410(8): Details of calculation

410(8): Details of calculation

410(8): Details of calculation

The computer check would be very important as usual.The formulae I used are given in Eqs. (1) to (9) of Note 410(8). Eqs. (8) and (9) define v sub T squared and v sub R squared respectively, using the total observed precession delta phi sub T and the reduced precession delta phi sub R of the first table. I used the now obsolete Einstein precession of Eq. (1) and Eq. (2) for Mars to Pluto, because delta phi sub R (experimental) cannot be found in a google search. So I took the dogmatists at their word and equated delta phi sub R and delta phi sub E, although I do not believe a word of EGR any more. The omega sub + is defined in Eq. (4), and the omega sub – in Eq. (6).

Reference

1) D. R. Williams "Planetary Fct Sheet", NASA Godard Space Flight Center, (online).

How did you get the squared velocities V_T and v_R in Table 1? As I understand you took the values <v_N> and <r> from NASA tables. I would expect that v_T and v_R are of the same order of magnitude but there aren’t. Could you write up all formulas you used? Then I could check this by computer.
Also the NASA source should be referenced in the final paper.

Horst

Am 09.07.2018 um 07:55 schrieb Myron Evans:

410(8): Results from the Universal Law of Precessions applied to the Planets

In this final note for UFT410 results are given from the universal law of precessions of ECE theory. Precessions are described in terms of the angular velocity of frame of rotation of the ECE2 infinitesimal line element. The precessions are matched exactly in every case by a given angular velocity that originates in spacetime torsion. Results are also given for the Hulse Taylor binary pulsar and for the S2 star. Tables of results such as this can be drawn up for every precession in the universe, and the Einstein field equation discarded as obsolete in many ways.

Advertisements