apologies, I meant not 417(5)/ 417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

Sorry, I meant to refer to uft417 note 5.
-Russ

On Sunday, October 21, 2018, 11:47:19 AM GMT-5, Russell Davis <russdavis1234@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi Prof Evans,

In note 417(6), you identified the condition for maximum (infinite) energy coupled from the vacuum as,
[(d/dr)m(r)] – (2/r)m(r) =0 , which seems to be solvable analytically. Wolfram produces the the simple parabolic solution in r as follows:


m(r) = c_1 (r^2).

Can this m(r) or an approximation be physically realizable?


cheers,
Russ Davis
Miami,FL

On Sunday, October 21, 2018, 3:27:28 AM GMT-5, Myron Evans <myronevans123@gmail.com> wrote:

417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

This note proves that frame rotation originates in the spherical spacetime and non-Minkowski metric. The forward and retrograde precessions of orbits in the classical limit are given by Eqs. (15) and (17) and the angular frequency of frame rotation is given by Eqs. (22) and (23) respectively for forward and retrograde precession. The m theory is the more fundamental theory and the whole of physics can be developed in terms of it.

Virus-free. www.avast.com
Advertisements

417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

Hi Prof Evans,

In note 417(6), you identified the condition for maximum (infinite) energy coupled from the vacuum as,
[(d/dr)m(r)] – (2/r)m(r) =0 , which seems to be solvable analytically. Wolfram produces the the simple parabolic solution in r as follows:


m(r) = c_1 (r^2).

Can this m(r) or an approximation be physically realizable?


cheers,
Russ Davis
Miami,FL

On Sunday, October 21, 2018, 3:27:28 AM GMT-5, Myron Evans <myronevans123@gmail.com> wrote:

417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

This note proves that frame rotation originates in the spherical spacetime and non-Minkowski metric. The forward and retrograde precessions of orbits in the classical limit are given by Eqs. (15) and (17) and the angular frequency of frame rotation is given by Eqs. (22) and (23) respectively for forward and retrograde precession. The m theory is the more fundamental theory and the whole of physics can be developed in terms of it.

Virus-free. www.avast.com

Writing the Third Volume of My Autobiography

Writing the Third Volume of My Autobiography

I have started to write the third volume of my autobiography, taking the title from the Athenian Thoikididis (Thucydides) "The Peloponnesian War". In particular this describes the events at University of North Carolina Charlotte and their subsequent international condemnation by staff at Cornell, where I inferred B(3) in Nov. 1991, and all over the world. It describes my defence of the B(3) field, later nominated a few times for a Nobel Prize. UNCC wanted to get rid of this heretical idea, which overturns the standard model of physics, so fabricated profoundly evil charges of working too much at home and so on. These charges were transparently false, and ten years later I was appointed a Civil List Pensioner in 2005 by Queen Elizabeth on the advice of the Prime Minister Tony Blair, the nominator being the Royal Society of Chemistry. UNCC was denounced by Jean Pierre Vigier, who was invited by Albert Einstein to become his assistant. Vigier was a leading French statesman as well as a leading theoretical physicist. The B(3) field is irrefutable experimental evidence for photon mass, evidence from the inverse Faraday effect. I chose the title because Thucydides was the first historian, and the first to write objective history. The high peak of civilization known as Periclean Athens was laid waste by Sparta and by a deadly plague. Since then I have worked as an intellectual, my work has made a huge impact as is well known. This huge impact is a giant vote of no confidence among the colleagues and general public in the standard model of physics. It has catalyzed a permanent paradigm shift. with the invaluable help of AIAS / UPITEC have devised a method of publication that goes straight to the colleagues for their assessment, so new ideas can no longer be censored by anonymous dogmatists and academics. The innocent members of my family suffered greatly because of UNCC and were impoverished until my Pensions materialized in 2015. The Athenians are the enlightened scientists who study my work by the millions, the Spartans are the anonymous, bronze clad bigots of any era.

417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

417(6): The Relation between m and Frame Rotation Theories

This note proves that frame rotation originates in the spherical spacetime and non-Minkowski metric. The forward and retrograde precessions of orbits in the classical limit are given by Eqs. (15) and (17) and the angular frequency of frame rotation is given by Eqs. (22) and (23) respectively for forward and retrograde precession. The m theory is the more fundamental theory and the whole of physics can be developed in terms of it.

a417thpapernotes6.pdf

Reception Given to Special Relativity

Special Relativity

Many thanks to Norman and Kerry. The term electron was coined by the Irish physicist George Johnstone Stoney and taken up by Fitzgerald, who used some of Heaviside’s equations to speculate length contraction, which is inherent in the Lorentz transform. As described in Sean Carroll’s "Spacetime and Geometry", chapter one, the Lorentz transform is a special case of general covariance. ECE theory is generally covariant and reduces to Lorentz covariance. There are many refutations of general relativity but the time dilatation of special relativity has been measured very accurately. There are also philosophical problems with special relativity. The basic idea of special relativity is the constancy of the four vector (ct, r bold) under frame transformation.
This leads to the Minkowski infinitesimal line element and as shown many times in the UFT papers leads to the Einstein energy equation from the line element. Thucydides sums up the situation in special relativity: "Knowledge without understanding is nothing". This sums up the class of 1971 listening to lectures by Granville Beynon on special relativity in a damp lecture theatre. After these lectures on special relativity I regurgitated my notes and learnt nothing. The Lorentz invariance is summarized by r squared – (ct) squared = r’ squared (ct’) squared. It is seen that c is constant but the time t changes to t’. This generalizes the Galilean transform r squared = r’ squared. The line element of m space is a modification of that used by Lorentz. The original equations of James Clerk Maxwell are written in Hamilton’s quaternions and are exceedingly complicated . They are completely different from the Maxwell Heaviside equations devised by Heaviside and the Maxwellian group that included Fitzgerald. Hamilton and Fitzgerald were Dubliners who worked in Trinity College Dublin. Hamilton was a professor at the age of twenty three. Hamilton was definitely an Irish invention, along with Dublin brewery. Anyone who has worked at Trinity College Dublin wakes up to the smell of brewing Guinness, so after inhaling this for a few years, the idea of quaternions came to Hamilton and he wrote them on a Dublin bridge. I have no idea why he wrote them on a bridge, where they could easily have fallen into the river.

Reception Given to Special Relativity

Dont forget, Einstein’s work came out of Einstein’s study of James Clerk Maxwell’s equations that he studied while missing Minkowski’s maths lessons. Scotland pioneered special relativity!

Kerry

On Saturday, 20 October 2018, Myron Evans <myronevans123> wrote:

Reception Given to Special Relativity

Using these google keywords the fourth site that comes up shows how special relativity was cold shouldered almost everywhere when it was published in 1905. It was ignored completely in England and France and criticised in Germany and the United States. In the rest of Britain there was no understanding of special relativity because Wales and Scotland were told what to think in science. Wales and Scotland were impoverished and no one cared about special relativity. Einstein criticised the concept of aether, which was part of establishment thinking in 1905. ECE has shown that the aether or vacuum is spacetime itself. Special relativity is now known to be a limit of ECE theory. General relativity is refuted completely by ECE theory. The English scientific establishment is notoriously conservative, and has opposed every really new idea in physics. I can see this from my own Ph. D. supervisor, the chemist Mansel Davies, who came from Aberpennar (Mountain Ash) but was English in his views of physics, radically Welsh in everything else, down to his fiery red hair. He clearly did not understand a word or equation of special relativity. His supervisor Bury made an attempt to understand it. So as late as the thirties in Cambridge, Einstein was dismissed outright, always a sign of something interesting. My co author Vigier was invited to become Einstein’s assistant and immediately accepted B(3) theory because it means photon mass. Vigier was largely sidelined by the physics establishment, so were de Broglie and Einstein himself. The physics dogma is now in a tight bind, because the S2 star shows that EGR is totally wrong. In order for the physics establishment to survive, it must ignore ECE theory completely, it must not get into the newspapers and threaten funding. The nasty fringe of standard physics uses Wikipedia and hate sites to try to destroy the careers of free thinkers. As in George Orwell, "1984", they become "unpersons" whose work has never existed in doublethink, Orwell’s word for gross hypocrisy and cover up. These are the methods of totalitarianism, and must be rejected completely by a free society. Internet criminals extend these methods to the general public. "Big Brother is watching you" as in Orwell’s warning written in 1948.

Reception Given to Special Relativity

Reception Given to Special Relativity

Using these google keywords the fourth site that comes up shows how special relativity was cold shouldered almost everywhere when it was published in 1905. It was ignored completely in England and France and criticised in Germany and the United States. In the rest of Britain there was no understanding of special relativity because Wales and Scotland were told what to think in science. Wales and Scotland were impoverished and no one cared about special relativity. Einstein criticised the concept of aether, which was part of establishment thinking in 1905. ECE has shown that the aether or vacuum is spacetime itself. Special relativity is now known to be a limit of ECE theory. General relativity is refuted completely by ECE theory. The English scientific establishment is notoriously conservative, and has opposed every really new idea in physics. I can see this from my own Ph. D. supervisor, the chemist Mansel Davies, who came from Aberpennar (Mountain Ash) but was English in his views of physics, radically Welsh in everything else, down to his fiery red hair. He clearly did not understand a word or equation of special relativity. His supervisor Bury made an attempt to understand it. So as late as the thirties in Cambridge, Einstein was dismissed outright, always a sign of something interesting. My co author Vigier was invited to become Einstein’s assistant and immediately accepted B(3) theory because it means photon mass. Vigier was largely sidelined by the physics establishment, so were de Broglie and Einstein himself. The physics dogma is now in a tight bind, because the S2 star shows that EGR is totally wrong. In order for the physics establishment to survive, it must ignore ECE theory completely, it must not get into the newspapers and threaten funding. The nasty fringe of standard physics uses Wikipedia and hate sites to try to destroy the careers of free thinkers. As in George Orwell, "1984", they become "unpersons" whose work has never existed in doublethink, Orwell’s word for gross hypocrisy and cover up. These are the methods of totalitarianism, and must be rejected completely by a free society. Internet criminals extend these methods to the general public. "Big Brother is watching you" as in Orwell’s warning written in 1948.

The origin of frame rotation theory in m theory

The origin of frame rotation theory in m theory

It is straightforward to show by comparison of the infinitesimal line elements of the two theories that m(r) is approximately 1 – 3 (v sub phi / c) squared, so the frame rotation originates in m(r). Here v sub phi is the velocity of the frame rotation. The precession in this case is delta phi = omega T, where v sub phi = omega r. Retrograde precession is explained by reversing the sense of frame rotation as shown in recent UFT papers. Einsteinian general relativity is completely unable to explain retrograde precession, recently observed experimentally by leading astronomers in the S2 star, but ECE2 theory explains it very simply. This is one of many fundamental advances made by ECE2 theory, to unprecedented collegial acclaim. The standard model establishment has been made irrelevant by Baconian science, not for the first time in history. I will distribute this calculation tomorrow.

Advertisements